Moskalenko, Victor. The Diamond Dutch: Strategic Ideas & Powerful Weapons. Alkmaar: New in Chess, 2014. 300pp. ISBN 978-9056914417. PB $29.95; currently about $21 at Amazon.
Victor Moskalenko is one of our most consistently – with one misstep – engaging and creative chess authors. His two books on the French – The Wonderful Winawer and The Flexible French (sadly out-of-print) – are both original and erudite. When I was putting together my French repertoire, in fact, I found that Moskalenko’s French books walk that very fine line between not enough detail and entirely too much. His analysis is clear, if sometimes idiosyncratic, and he explains the key ideas and themes well. Moskalenko has also penned books on the Budapest and the Pirc-Modern. Now he takes on the Dutch, an opening that is growing in popularity as it appears more and more at the Grandmaster level.
The Diamond Dutch is a complete book on the Dutch. It covers all the major Dutch and anti-Dutch lines without favoring White or Black in the process, as sometimes happens in repertoire books. While the Stonewall, Classical and Leningrad variations are all treated here, the Stonewall and Leningrad receive a slightly larger share of Moskalenko’s attention; those interested in the Classical or the ‘Dutch Nimzo-Indian’ should note this.
This book follows Moskalenko’s usual format in that it uses complete games to anchor the analysis. There is quite a bit of prose, and Moskalenko makes use of a number of symbols (or emojis?!) to make certain ideas or analytical bits prominent. You can get a sense of how this plays out in the text by looking at the sample pdf on the New in Chess website. There is a key on p.4 of the pdf (p.8 in the book) and some of the symbols appear in the sample text that follows.
It’s always interesting to see how new opening books stack up to their peers. In his review, for example, Dennis Monokroussos compared Moskalenko’s analysis of 2.Nc3 with that offered by John Watson in his recent (and excellent, by the way!) A Strategic Opening Repertoire for White. He also compares Moskalenko’s coverage of 2.Bg5 with with Larry Kaufman’s analysis in his Kaufman Repertoire.
Having reviewed Richard Pert’s book on the Trompowsky, which contains analysis of 2.Bg5 vs the Dutch, I had thought that I might undertake a similar comparison for my review. Moskalenko does not cite Pert – his bibliography is surprisingly slight – so perhaps such a comparison might be both illustrative and illuminating. What I found was interesting, although perhaps not in the way I had expected.
Pert’s analysis, on first blush, seemed to anticipate a lot of Moskalenko’s, and with good reason! Pert cites NIC Yearbook surveys by Moskalenko in the introduction to his analysis. When I went back to the two surveys in NIC Yearbooks 94 and 95, I was in for a bit of a shock. There is a tremendous amount of overlap between the surveys and the 2.Bg5 chapter in The Diamond Dutch. Indeed, it is as if the 2.Bg5 chapter is a condensed version of these two surveys. The games are much the same, the analysis is quite similar, and great swathes of prose appear verbatim in both places.
There is more. Chapters 4 and 5 in The Diamond Dutch are ‘broader update[s]’ (87) of two chapters from Revolutionize Your Chess. Moskalenko acknowledges this in the introduction to chapter 4, and while there are improvements and updates in the text – most notably, the hamfisted ‘touchstones’ from Revolutionize are omitted here – Moskalenko paraphrases his previous analysis and text when not simply reprinting it.
Some of these updates are found in other NIC Yearbooks. HIs attempt to outfox Avrukh (ch4, pp.128-138) is anticipated by a survey in NIC YB 101, albeit with a number of updates and refinements new toThe Diamond Dutch. Pages 123-128 find a very near relative in a survey from NIC YB 102. Finally, the notes to some other games – Van Wely-Moskalenko, Ciudad Real 2004, for instance – have clear antecedents in the notes in surveys for Chessbase Magazine 120 and 121.
Let me be clear. I’m not opposed to an author reworking previously published material, especially if the material is as good as that in The Diamond Dutch. I’d simply like to see some kind of acknowledgement of that repackaging and reworking somewhere in the book.
That said, all of this reworking and updating finds its end in a finely polished analytical effort. In my survey of Moskalenko’s analysis of 2.Bg5, for instance, I thought that the chapter was a broad and representative survey of all the main lines for both sides. Whereas Pert gives a tight repertoire for White, Moskalenko provides enough material for both White and Black to navigate the variation. I did, however, note a curious omission. After 1.d4 f5 2.Bg5 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.h4 Moskalenko analyzes 4…h6 and 4…Nh6, omitting 4…Nf6. This, to me, is like leaving the punch line off the joke, since the whole point of the h4 push is (a la Pert and Schandorff) to sacrifice the exchange on h5 if Black plays …Nf6!
Fans of Simon Williams and his ‘Killer Dutch’ will be glad to know that Moskalenko addresses one of the current difficulties in the Classical Dutch. He confirms Williams’ idea (given here in the essential ChessPub forums by Williams himself!) that after the critical line 1.Nf3 f5 2.d4 e6 3.c4 Nf6 4.g3 Be7 5.Bg2 0-0 6.0-0 d6 7.Nc3 Ne4!? 8.Nxe4!? Black should continue 8…fxe4 9.Nd2 d5 10.f3!? Nc6!? with decent prospects.
Dutch aficionados will find in The Diamond Dutch a ‘refined’ and reliable guide to all major variations. Those who play closed positions with White will find much here to inspire the next assault on Black’s f-pawn. I do not think there is a better guide to the Dutch – for either color – currently in print.